From time to time, I devote my analysis to a single article. One from The Forward on a pundit's suggestions for reviving a defeated Democratic Party invites a paragraph-by-paragraph assessment.His Op-Ed; My Thoughts
https://forward.com/opinion/756508/what-democrats-fighting-trump-should-learn-from-germany-hitler/
In the final years of the Weimar Republic, the German left was paralyzed by ideological divisions, by a failure to persuade broad swathes of the populace that it was capable of guiding the country out of its economic and domestic turmoil, and to neutralize the snowballing popular appeal of a budding despot — Adolf Hitler.
Weimar had power. If Germany was not functioning, they owned that non-function.
Today, the American left faces a similarly perilous moment. Since Donald Trump began his second term in office, the Democratic Party — shut out of power in both chambers of Congress — has been flailing around in search of ways to thwart his dismantling of the country’s democratic norms. And with the MAGA-fied Congressional Republicans marching in lock-step with Trump, he has repeatedly outmaneuvered the fractured Democrats.
The real problem, though, is they were voted out nationally for cause. Donald Trump was not an unknown, as Hitler was by comparison in 1933. American voters replace failing leaders with some frequency in our history. We have had states seceed to protect their cultural norm of slavery. We could have elected at that time a President who would compromise on this or a President who would say Good Riddance and salvage some of the prosperity of cotton diplomatically with a prototype of two two-state solution. Lincoln and Roosevelt could only sell virtue if they could also sell competence. Bill Clinton sold competence. Trump's message, right or wrong, is that of a problem solver in a time when problems are large.
We’ve seen a version of this movie before, in a different setting, with different players, and with different social, economic and cultural conditions. Parallels are inexact, of course. But there are so many similarities that they warrant an examination of why the German left — and in particular the Social Democratic Party — failed to stop Hitler.Let’s go back to November 1918, with Germany losing World War I, Kaiser Wilhelm II abdicating, revolutionary upheaval erupting across the land, the leftist Social Democratic Party (SPD) taking over governance and trying to launch Germany’s first democracy under tumultuous circumstances.
From the founding of the Weimar Republic until its death in 1933, the German left was fatally divided over the nation’s direction. The SPD was the strongest force on the German left. The German Communist Party also had mass appeal, but favored revolution and a Bolshevist-style regime over cooperating with the SPD.
The SPD itself was riddled with dissension — torn between pragmatic reformism and revolutionary Marxism. A faction called the Independent Social Democratic Party of Germany (USPD) split from the mainstream Social Democrats over ideological disagreements.a
And today we have a party divide nationally, though not state by state. AOC is not a statewide official. The Berne and Sen. Warren are, but they function as two of a hundred. Neither occupies their Governor's Mansion. Democratic Governors, functioning in states where people have graduate degrees, work at the forefront of commerce, medical care, and technology, have to sell competence and stability. They fix roads, make sure there are enough insured patients to get their doctors paid, have adequate public transit. And they have predictable failures that generate resentment, the DEI, their campuses, the decline of institutions of social engagement.
In early November, 1918, Independent Socialist Kurt Eisner led a revolution in Munich, overthrowing the Bavarian monarchy and proclaiming the People’s State of Bavaria. Eisner was assassinated on Feb. 21, 1919 by a far-right nationalist. Radical left-wing factions, including anarchists and communists, seized the moment and proclaimed the Bavarian Soviet Republic. This regime was short-lived, crushed within weeks by radical-right Freikorps paramilitaries and forces loyal to the central government in Berlin.
We have a certain failure of Democratic Presidents to restore order, even when public sentiment runs in that direction. It takes a lot of forms from Vietnam/Racial violent gatherings, torching cars after a sports event, going to the Walgreens for cough syrup and finding it locked and the first two scarce salespeople do not have the key. This year, Jewish students chased across the college quad with bullhorns while College Deans and the invariably Democratic elected officials of those states and municipalities let it happen. People fundamentally want to live peacefully. It is the other folks who are troublemakers.
The chaos, bloodshed and terror during the brief reign of the Bavarian Soviet Republic traumatized many Germans, weakened the left, and strengthened conservatives, monarchists, and far-right extremists like the German Workers’ Party, soon to become the National Socialist German Workers’ Party — the Nazis.
They sold themselves as problem solvers. And people with the strength to bring order and prosperity about.
Although Germany’s political landscape was badly splintered, the mainstream Social Democrats — backed by trade unions — were a prominent player through most of the life of the Weimar Republic, leading, or being a part of coalition governments. Their power began to wane as the Communists gained traction on the left, while nationalist and conservative factions surged on the right. The Social Democrats’ decision to support Centrist Chancellor Heinrich BrĂ¼ning — despite his use of emergency decrees — was seen by many as a betrayal of democratic principles, further eroding their credibility. By the time Hitler was appointed chancellor in January 1933, the SPD was politically isolated, morally exhausted, and institutionally sidelined.
Nearly a century later, the echoes of Weimar reverberate in Washington. Since Trump began his second term, America has witnessed a spree of executive overreach that has undermined democracy: mass pardons for convicted insurrectionists, an assault on birthright citizenship, extortionist tactics against higher education, law firms and the press, and a gutting of civil protections.
The question remains, can you sell virtue when competence lags?
Democrats, still reeling from Kamala Harris’s narrow defeat and locked out of Congressional power, have struggled to mount a coherent resistance. There have been bright moments: Sen. Cory Booker’s marathon floor speech galvanized activists, however briefly, and state attorneys general have eked out temporary restraining orders against some of Trump’s more brazen orders. But the party’s broader response has lacked urgency and imagination. Sometimes the Democrats’ flailing for relevance produces moments too easy to lampoon, like Chuck Schumer’s boast that he had used a Senate rule to strip the title “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” from Trump’s $3.3 trillion spending package.
It really wasn't a narrow defeat. The margin was small in each swing state and nationally. However, that small margin was maintained very consistently in each jurisdiction. A plurality of 50% + 1 is an electoral approval for the majority to implement what they proposed. My Jewish world conveys many illusions of its success. I get newsletters from local Chabad, some of the dearest people around, showing photos of their events. The pictures look like SRO crowds. When I attend a few, there are maybe a dozen participants. My shul, a non-egal place, promotes women's participation. Women read four verse aliyot, men read the others, but they create a promotional illusion of parity that isn't accurate but reinforces belief in gender equality. Nor does it advance the capacity of some very talented women. Cory Booker and Schumer had their fifteen minutes, or 24h of fame, but were fundamentally ineffectual people who put themselves on display.
Much like their Weimar counterparts, many of today’s Democrats appear trapped in the belief that the system’s norms will somehow correct themselves. But Trump flouts the norms on a daily basis, leaving the Democrats clutching a rulebook that has already been shredded by America’s 47th president.
One can argue that many norms were shredded before that. Moreover, they are replaced with new norms. One need only read an etiquette book from the 1960s and one from the 1990's, often revisions of the same code by the same author. Early etiquette books did not have chapters on safe sex, which partner supplies the condom, or when female or minority employees should be assertive. The emergence of anti-Semitism from the Sewer might be Trump 45, it's eruption on elite campuses certainly is not. New taboos of microagressions correlate a lot more with social media and phone technology than they do with who holds office. Abe Foxman, probably my favorite Jewish advocate, used to insist on taking advantage of the rules, whatever they happened to be.
The Democratic Party needs to restore its connection with the masses, shed its aura of elitism, learn how to speak in a language that resonates beyond Beltway bubbles. An anti-Trump resistance movement has spread across the land over the past few months. Why aren’t prominent Democratic politicians at the front of these marches? Of course, there could be security concerns. So why not come up with some novel, creative ways to embed leading Democrats directly in the beating heart of resistance?
This one I almost agree with, though they may be handicapped. I think one historical element that needs an answer is why the Red Wave predicted in 2022 did not happen, but came with consistency, if not a vengeance, two years later. The elected officials were already in place. The culture of identity politics, many would say pandering, had been established. Closure of hourly earners from the American Dream had been settled. Yet in 2020, Americans voted a Democratic majority and largely held it amid the culture wars already in place. What changed is that they didn't own the problems once they were given their governing mandate. They didn't just have elites, not that it mattered. There is no greater collection of elitists than the current Cabinet. What the voters said, I think, is that they botched their chance to govern fairly. They protected a President, who I met many times as my Senator and admired personally, even though he wasn't up to the task. By 2024, Harvard and Columbia where my parents wanted to send me and where I wanted to direct my kids, had corrupted liberal education outside the quantitative sciences. Their supporters sought vengeance for petty verbal comments they perceived as infractions, such as saying there were only two genders or equating anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism. In short, my party governed poorly when given the chance. Neither side has virtue to promote. Instead, they are asking voters to judge who can bring us closer to the life we'd like to have. A few human sacrifices along the way? The pro-Hamas and pro-Ayatollah crowd, part of a Democratic base as the primary voters in NYC exposed, don't seem put off by the concept of Human Sacrifice to meet desired ends.
Here’s an idea: a rebirth of whistlestop tours. Recruit fifteen or so Democrats — potential presidential candidates plus a roster of other politicians and even non-politicians who are admired by Americans and have shown an ability to connect with people on a gut level. Have them board a train that would be christened the “Democracy Express.”
All depends on who gets a ticket to ride. Needless to say, every losing candidate had high profile endorsements.
Just imagine this list of passengers aboard the “Democracy Express,” going from city to city, town to town across the land, talking about issues that resonate with all Americans: JB Pritzker, Andy Beshear, Gavin Newsom, Kamala Harris, Pete Buttigieg, Josh Shapiro, Gretchen Whitmer, Cory Booker plus proven crowd draws like Bernie Sanders and AOC. Add a couple of fresh faces, like Jon Ossoff, the young senator from Georgia, and Becca Balint, Vermont’s representative in the U.S. House. Make a show of a united front — with baseball caps and T-shirts emblazoned with the words “Democracy Express” handed out at every stop.
What this exaggerates is the reality of how few statesmen we have in the public arena. Princess Di engaged the world, in large part because the future King, or his shadchan, opted for a charming lady too young to have a searchable past. All the people on that train carry their assailable, searchable baggage. I think the public abhors entitlement, as the 2016 results reflected. The Dems have done much better with people like Princess Di, who come as unknown talents. Jimmy Who, that nice Senator from Illinois. I'd replace a couple of People of Entitlement with people of widespread respect. Gov. Schwartznegger, Abe Foxman, NIH director Collins, maybe my own Senator Coons, Sen. Kelly, Gov. Stein, David Brooks or Bret Stephens from the NYT. They need to restore respectability and sell wisdom, which still has a market to replace the illusion of virtue, which does not.
And as head of this delegation, why not Rev. Mariann Edgar Budde, the Episcopal bishop of Washington who made Trump squirm in the front row of a church service by asking that he “have mercy” on LGBTQ+ communities, undocumented immigrants, and others who felt threatened by his policies. In a way, Budde was a founder of the anti-Trump resistance. So she would deserve her own compartment on the “Democracy Express.”
Maybe she would. But so would Rabbi Buchdal or Rabbi Wolpe. Or the Dalai Lama who cannot vote. But you also need people who build their congregations, not just inherit what somebody else created.
Defending democracy requires more than integrity—it demands strategy, daring, imagination, a unity of spirit, and the courage to call authoritarianism by its name.
I'll end my commentary on The Forward's op-ed with something I keep on my whiteboard in my line of sight from my desk chair. It comes from an anthology called Jewish Megatrends. Its editor, Rabbi Sid Schwarz of Clal, distilled his vision of Judaism into four core elements.
- Chochma=Wisdom
- Tzedek=Righteousness
- Kehillah=Community
- Kedusha=Sanctity
While the public votes for perceptions, usually scripted ones, of what enhancements they might experience based on who they offer power, the core virtues never disappear, even if their absence are not dealbreakers. Each of the R Schwarz' elements has an illusion and the real thing. Demeaning trans, Jews, Muslims, The Other Party in the name of Sanctity is the illusion. And as Torah emphasizes by putting Mishpatim right after the Ten Commandments, making people's lives as decent as you can, that's Sanctity and Tzedek. That's what the battered Democrats have a chance to promote. But the cast of characters on Terry's train doesn't seem up to that challenge.